Abstract

AimWe evaluated traditional biogeographic boundaries of coastal marine regions in Southwestern Atlantic using DNA sequence data from common, rocky‐shore inhabiting, marine mites of the genera Agauopsis and Rhombognathus, family Halacaridae.MethodsWe investigated geographic population genetic structure using CO1 gene sequences, estimated divergence times using a multigene dataset and absolute time‐calibrated molecular clock analyses, and performed environmental niche modeling (ENM) of common marine mite species.Results Agauopsis legionium has a shallow history (2.01 Ma) with four geographically differentiated groups. Two of them corresponded to the traditional Amazonian and Northeastern ecoregions, but the boundary between the two other groups was inferred at the Abrolhos Plateau, not Cabo Frio. Rhombognathus levigatoides s. lat. was represented by two cryptic species that diverged 7.22 (multilocus data) or 10.01 Ma (CO1‐only analyses), with their boundary, again at the Abrolhos Plateau. ENM showed that A. legionium has suitable habitats scattered along the coast, while the two R. levigatoides cryptic species differ considerably in their niches, especially in parameters related to upwelling. This indicates that genetic isolation associated with the Abrolhos Plateau occurred in both lineages, but for the R. levigatoides species complex, ecological niche specialization was also an important factor.Main conclusionsOur study suggests that the major biogeographic boundary in the Southwestern Atlantic lies not at Cabo Frio but at the Abrolhos Plateau. There two biogeographically relevant factors meet (a) changes in current directions (which limit dispersal) and (b) abrupt changes in environmental parameters associated with the South Atlantic Central Waters (SACW) upwelling (offering distinct ecological niches). We suggest that our result represents a general biogeographic pattern because a barrier at the Abrolhos Plateau was found previously for the fish genus Macrodon (phylogeographic data), prosobranch mollusks, ascidians, and reef fishes (community‐level data).

Highlights

  • Concordance of phylogeographic and biogeographic patterns provide a useful framework for investigating and comparing patterns of evolution of faunas around the globe (Dawson, 2001). Such concordance is expected since faunal provinces are based upon endemism (Briggs, 1974), and the same factors that fuel speciation lead to population genetic structuring, making both processes interchangeable in the short term (Nosil et al, 2009, Sukumaran & Knowles, 2017)

  • High fecundity and planktonic dispersive larvae are associated with slight if any genetic structure as observed in many studies performed along the Brazilian coast: mangrove crabs (Oliveira-Neto et al, 2007), land blue crabs (Oliveira-Neto et al, 2008), interstitial ribbon worms (Andrade et al, 2011) and littorinid snails (Andrade et al, 2003)

  • Halacarid mites as models for marine biogeography This study aims at testing long held ideas about biogeographic division of the Brazilian coast using phylogeographic analyses of common marine meiobentic species as proxies

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Concordance of phylogeographic (population level) and biogeographic (above species level) patterns provide a useful framework for investigating and comparing patterns of evolution of faunas around the globe (Dawson, 2001). Such concordance is expected since faunal provinces are based upon endemism (Briggs, 1974), and the same factors (e.g. barriers to dispersal, divergent natural selection) that fuel speciation lead to population genetic structuring, making both processes interchangeable in the short term (Nosil et al, 2009, Sukumaran & Knowles, 2017). High fecundity and planktonic dispersive larvae are associated with slight if any genetic structure as observed in many studies performed along the Brazilian coast: mangrove crabs (Oliveira-Neto et al, 2007), land blue crabs (Oliveira-Neto et al, 2008), interstitial ribbon worms (Andrade et al, 2011) and littorinid snails (Andrade et al, 2003)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call