Evaluating taxonomic homogenization of freshwater fish assemblages in Chile

Pamela V Vargas,Ivan Arismendi,Daniel Gomez-Uchida

doi:10.1186/s40693-015-0046-2

Abstract

Pervasive introductions of non-native taxa are behind processes of homogenization of various types affecting the global flora and fauna. Chile’s freshwater ecosystems encompass a diverse and highly endemic fish fauna that might be sensitive to the introduction of non-native species, an ongoing process that started two centuries ago, but has to date received little attention. Using historical (native) and present-day (native and non-native) presence-absence data sets of compositional similarity, our goal was twofold: (1) evaluate patterns of taxonomic homogenization at various spatial scales and (2) identify clusters of widely versus narrowly distributed species to assess their relative role in compositional changes. We expect that non-native species with wide distributions might have a larger influence in taxonomic homogenization than those with narrow distributions. Chile’s fish assemblages have become increasingly homogenized during the last two centuries when evaluating changes in compositional similarity among 201 watersheds (65.3 % of total comparisons showed homogenization) distributed among six defined biotic units. Taxonomic differentiation was significantly more prevalent than taxonomic homogenization within biotic units. Among biotic units, comparisons between historical and current compositional similarity were all significantly different. We identified one cluster of non-native fishes that were distributed across the entire five or six biotic units. This cluster included Brown Trout (Salmo trutta) and Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) as the two most representative species. A second cluster we identified included fishes such that on average spanned only one or two biotic units. We provide first evidence for an ongoing and large-scale process of taxonomic homogenization among Chile’s watersheds occurring at various scales. Our findings provide taxonomic and biogeographic baseline information for management plans and courses of action for conservation of native fishes, many of which are endemic. We also discuss management guidelines of non-native fishes in Chile. Baseline information of both native and non-native fish taxa might be applicable to other isolated regions elsewhere.

Highlights

Introduction of salmonids inChile has occurred since the late 1800s motivated by the establishment of recreational fisheries, with stocking efforts as common practice since 1960 until the present (Basulto 2003; Arismendi and Nahuelhual 2007; Arismendi et al 2014)
Patagonia has not been described as an area of endemism, we included it as the sixth biotic unit of our watershed it remained established in all subsequent years (Pool and Olden 2012)
Historical and current freshwater fish assemblages The historical dataset of native fishes comprised 7 orders, 11 families, 17 genera, and 44 species of which 82 % were endemic and 72 % were classified within various categories of conservation

Summary

Introduction

Introduction of salmonids inChile has occurred since the late 1800s motivated by the establishment of recreational fisheries, with stocking efforts as common practice since 1960 until the present (Basulto 2003; Arismendi and Nahuelhual 2007; Arismendi et al 2014). Biotic homogenization between communities represents a major biogeographic and ecological threat for biodiversity at a regional and global scale (Olden and Poff 2004; Rooney et al, 2004; Olden 2006; Olden and Rooney 2006; Marr et al 2010, 2013) This phenomenon might include loss of taxonomic, functional, or genetic differentiation (Olden 2006). TH represents a form of biodiversity loss and can result from local species turnover

Objectives

Methods

Results

Discussion

Conclusion