Abstract
Abstract Developing tools and methodologies for the evaluation of sustainable buildings is essential to promote transparency in the building design community. Building sustainability includes attributes from the built, natural, and social systems and inherently requires a series of trade-offs. These complex and often competing priorities require consideration at each stage of a building's life cycle. A total of 24 environmental, social, and economic indicators were developed and applied to three alternative building systems: cross-laminated timber (CLT), steel and glass, and reinforced concrete. The goal of this study was to demonstrate the use of a multi-attribute decision support system (MADSS) that uses a series of indicators, assigns numerical values to these indicators, and then allows for systematic evaluation and ranking of alternatives. A case study approach was used to demonstrate the utility of the MADSS approach in identifying “hot spots” and trade-offs for the three building systems. Portland,...
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
