Abstract
Soil physical quality (SPQ) is an important parameter for crop growth. Tillage management is widely recognized to affect SPQ remarkably, but such an effect is complicated in Vertisols by shrinking and swelling soil structure. The objectives of this study were to (i) investigate how tillage practices affected SPQ as indicated by the S index, least limiting water range (LLWR) and water stress percentage (WSP); and (ii) determine the relationship between these SPQ indicators and crop yield. A 4-year field experiment, which was conducted in a Vertisol under wheat-maize rotation system in the North China Plain, consisted of four tillage treatments: no tillage (NT), rotary tillage (RT), subsoiling (SS), and deep ploughing (DP). Soil water retention curve (SWRC), soil shrinkage curve (SSC), penetration resistance (PR), and bulk density (BD) of the 0−10 and 10−20 cm layer were measured during wheat and maize seasons, and soil water content was continuously monitored in situ. The S index, LLWR and WSP were determined. Our results showed that SSCs were parallel to each other among four tillage treatments, indicating that tillage did not impact shrinkage capacity (P > 0.05). Relative to NT and RT treatments, the SS and DP treatments improved soil physical quality (higher S index and larger LLWR), particularly in the 10−20 cm layer. The S index presented a poor relation with wheat (P > 0.05) and maize yields (P > 0.05), while LLWR had a significant correlation with wheat yield (P < 0.05) but not with maize yield (P > 0.05). A new proposed SPQ indicator, WSP, is defined as the percentage of the period when the soil water content is above the field water capacity (waterlogging stress percentage, WLP) or below the wilting point (drought stress percentage, DSP) to the entire crop season period. The WLP presented a significantly negative relation with maize yield (P < 0.01) but not with wheat yield (P > 0.05), whereas the DSP had no relation with wheat and maize yield (P > 0.05). Moreover, the WSP was observed to be independent of the volume change in the Vertisol. Our results demonstrate that LLWR and WLP can be regarded as suitable indicators for evaluating SPQ in wheat and maize seasons, respectively, but the latter is more conveniently applied in a Vertisol.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.