Evaluating social vulnerability impact on care and prognosis of head & neck-nervous system cancers in the US.

Abstract

6526 Background: In the current literature, the association between social determinants of health (SDH) and head & neck-nervous system cancer (HNNsC) is limited by the narrow scope of SDH assessed and the broad classifications of HNNsC. Our study utilizes the CDC-Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) to assess both the individual and collective impact of four social determinant themes on various HNNsC in US adults. Methods: This study utilized the SEER database to evaluate 116,373 adult patients from 1975-2017 who presented with HNNsC. Patients were assigned SVI scores based on county-of-residence at the time of diagnosis, encompassing total-SVI score and 4 sub-scores of socioeconomic status, minority-language status, household composition, and housing-transportation. Using these scores, univariate linear regressions were used to assess patient care (months of follow-up) and prognosis (months of survival). Results: As total-SVI score increased, decreases in months of follow-up (MOF) and months of survival (MOS) were observed for many HNNsC tumors (p less than 0.001) when comparing the lowest to highest vulnerability cohorts. There was a decrease ranging from 3.55-36.6% in the MOF, with the largest decreases occurring in embryonal, anaplastic oligodendroglioma, and anaplastic ependymoma tumor types, with the largest sub-score contribution coming from socioeconomic status for these three disease classes. Similarly, there was a decrease ranging from 6.90-45.81% in the MOS, with the largest decreases occurring in anaplastic ependymoma, anaplastic astrocytoma, and pilocytic astrocytoma tumor types with the largest sub-score contribution coming from socioeconomic status for these three disease classes. Increases in vulnerability within SDH themes contributed significantly to these total-SVI trends in MOF and MOS, with each social determinant impacting different disease classes to varying extents. Socioeconomic status was the most impactful sub-score for MOF in nine of fourteen disease classes, followed by housing-transportation and household composition, each leading the impact of two of fourteen disease classes, and minority-language status leading the impact of one of fourteen disease classes. Similarly, socioeconomic status was the most impactful sub-score for MOS in eight of fourteen disease classes, followed by housing-transportation leading the impact of three of fourteen disease classes, household composition leading the impact of two of fourteen disease classes, and minority-language status leading the impact of one of fourteen disease classes. Conclusions: The results of this study show that with increasing social vulnerability, there is a significant decrease in both the care (follow-up) and the prognosis (survival) of US adults with HNNsC and highlight which SDH contributes more to disparities.