Abstract
Recent methodological advances have been used to create word lists based on large corpora. The present paper explores whether these corpora — and the associated lists — are unequivocally more representative. Corpus design considerations have usually focused on issues of external representativeness (representing the target discourse domain), while disregarding issues of internal representativeness (whether the corpus permits reliable descriptions of linguistic variation). This disregard may be especially problematic for studies of lexical variation, where it is difficult to achieve stable, reliable results from corpus analysis. The present paper illustrates these challenges through experiments based on analysis of a corpus representing a highly restricted discourse domain: university-level introductory psychology textbooks. The results indicate that corpus design and composition has a much greater influence on lexical variation than previously recognized, highlighting the need to evaluate internal representativeness in quantitative corpus-based research.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
