Evaluating multifunctionality and adaptive capacity of mountain forest management alternatives under climate change in the Eastern Alps

Florian Irauschek,Werner Rammer,Manfred J Lexer

doi:10.1007/s10342-017-1051-6

Florian Irauschek, Werner Rammer + Show 1 more

Open Access

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-017-1051-6

Copy DOI

Abstract

Future provisioning of ecosystem services (ES) from mountain forests is uncertain due to potential impacts of climate change. For a case study catchment in the Eastern Alps in Austria we analysed how management and climate change may affect the provisioning of four ES (timber production, carbon sequestration, biodiversity and bird habitat quality, and protection against gravitational hazards). We used the PICUS forest ecosystem model to project seven management alternatives that differed with regard to cutting pattern size (SLIT, PATCH, STRIP) and two harvesting intensity levels (in terms of return interval) under historic climate and five transient climate change scenarios over 100 years. In addition no management and sanitary management were simulated. In total twelve indicators were linked to model output to quantify ES provisioning. Results under historic climate showed increased volume and carbon stocks in low-intensity management, while high-intensity management decreased stocks. Bird habitat quality was maintained only by low-intensity management using SLIT and PATCH cuts. In particular rockfall protection decreased strongly under the STRIP cut scenario. Improved tree growth in warming scenarios was counterbalanced by increasing damage from bark beetle disturbances. Canopy openings and increased deadwood supply from disturbances partly fostered bird habitat quality in no-management alternatives. Overall none of the management alternatives performed best for all ES. PATCH and SLIT regimes at (currently practiced) low intensity appeared as compromise to achieve multifunctionality at small scale. As involved trade-offs among ES can be substantial, partial segregation with priority on specific services in designated zones is recommended.

Highlights

Forests in the European Alps provide a wide variety of ecosystem services (ES) for owners and society by creating income through timber production, protecting infrastructure from gravitational natural hazards, providing highquality drinking water and mitigating climate change through the uptake and storage of carbon (Buttoud 2000; Price et al 2000; Dorren et al 2004; Nabuurs et al 2014)
For a case study catchment in the Eastern Alps in Austria we analysed how management and climate change may affect the provisioning of four ES
First we briefly compare the temporal development of ES indicators under different management alternatives and historic climate to reflect the transient behaviour of ES provisioning in the study landscape

Summary

Introduction

Forests in the European Alps provide a wide variety of ecosystem services (ES) for owners and society by creating income through timber production, protecting infrastructure from gravitational natural hazards, providing highquality drinking water and mitigating climate change through the uptake and storage of carbon (Buttoud 2000; Price et al 2000; Dorren et al 2004; Nabuurs et al 2014). As a result of manifold demands for ecosystem services multifunctionality has been the main paradigm of forest policy and management in many European mountain. While negative impacts of large-scale cutting pattern on place-based ES provision such as protection against rockfall and avalanche release are obvious (compare Dorren et al 2004; Cordonnier et al 2008), for other ES the relation between forest management and service provisioning levels may not be as straight forward

Methods

Results

Conclusion