Evaluating Model Effectiveness for Soil Infiltration Attribute: Comparison of Green-Ampt, Horton and Modified Green-Ampt Infiltration Models

Abstract

Soil infiltration is a very important concept in hydrology as well as irrigation, which plays a vital role in estimating surface runoff and groundwater recharge. It is a complicated process that varies with numerous factors. Accurate estimation of soil infiltration is required for future irrigation, and many other purposes. To estimate the infiltration process, there are numerous models. The majority of them have some presumptions, a unique calculation method, and some limitations. The purpose of the paper was to assess the model’s performance for a similar hypothetical scenario involving soil infiltration. It compared the infiltration rate, runoff rate, and incremental infiltration versus time for three different infiltration models: the Green-Ampt model (GA), the Horton model and the Modified Green-Ampt (MGA) model. A spreadsheet was used to calculate the Horton model, and HYDROL-INF (V 5.03) was used to simulate the other two models. Among those three models, the MGA model outperformed those three models, while the GA model produced greater infiltration rate than rainfall, which was insensible. The study showed that the MGA model, which provides useful infiltration predictions, outperformed the other two infiltration models. Since the Horton model does not consider ponding conditions, it is only applicable when the effective rainfall intensity exceeds the final infiltration capacity. Moreover, the GA model’s initial infiltration rate is irrational because it disregards the intensity of the rainfall. The results of this study will assist in selecting the most accurate method for estimating soil infiltration for agricultural purposes.