Abstract
Three different methods for evaluating mitotic activity (mitotic count, mitoses/area, mitotic index) were applied to different types of canine and feline solid tumors to determine the method that is most objective and correlates best with other parameters of cell proliferation. Mitotic activity was evaluated on toluidine blue stained his-tological sections. Slides stained with histochemical (AgNOR proteins) and im-munohistochemical (MEB1, PCNA) markers of cell proliferation were available for each case. Quantitation of mitotic activity and cell proliferation parameters was performed with an image analyzer. Mitotic activity assessment was compared with cell proliferation indices and its ability to discriminate tumors grouped on histologically based criteria including the histological type, malignant or benign characteristics, and grade. A significant correlation by linear regression analysis with other parameters assessing cell proliferation revealed that mitotic index correlated 100% and mitoses/area and mitotic count correlated 40% of the time. In discriminating the proliferative activity of tumors grouped by histological criteria, mitotic index and mitotic count revealed 100% concordance with the other parameters of cell proliferation, while mitoses/areas showed 80% concordance.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
