Abstract

Evaluating the life cycle of buildings is a valuable tool for assessing sustainability and analyzing environmental consequences throughout the construction operations of buildings. In this study, in order to determine the importance of building life cycle evaluation indicators, a new combination method was used based on a quantitative-qualitative method (QQM) and a simplified best-worst method (SBWM). The SBWM method was used because it simplifies BWM calculations and does not require solving complex mathematical models. Reducing the time required to perform calculations and eliminating the need for complicated computer software are among the advantages of the proposed method. The QQM method has also been used due to its ability to evaluate quantitative and qualitative criteria simultaneously. The feasibility and applicability of the SBWM were examined using three numerical examples and a case study, and the results were evaluated. The results of the case study showed that the criteria of the estimated cost, comfort level, and basic floor area were, in order, the most important criteria among the others. The results of the numerical examples and the case study showed that the proposed method had a lower total deviation (TD) compared to the basic BWM. Sensitivity analysis results also confirmed that the proposed approach has a high degree of robustness for ranking and weighting criteria.

Highlights

  • Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a systematic approach to analyzing and evaluating the environmental impact of a product or process throughout its life cycle

  • The main purpose of this paper is to provide a combined approach based on simplified computational best-worst method (BWM) and quantitative-qualitative method (QQM) that will help researchers and DMs deal with decision-making issues in the life cycle of buildings

  • A modified version of BWM is provided, which has simpler calculations compared to the original model and does not require complex mathematical models and special software packages; In the new simplified best-worst method (SBWM), we propose mathematical relationships to calculate the consistency index of decision-makers’ preferences as well as to determine the source of inconsistency (SI); The SBWM is described using three numerical examples, and the hybrid QQM-SBWM

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a systematic approach to analyzing and evaluating the environmental impact of a product or process throughout its life cycle. The main purpose of this paper is to provide a combined approach based on simplified computational BWM and QQM that will help researchers and DMs deal with decision-making issues in the life cycle of buildings. A modified version of BWM is provided, which has simpler calculations compared to the original model and does not require complex mathematical models and special software packages; In the new SBWM, we propose mathematical relationships to calculate the consistency index of decision-makers’ preferences as well as to determine the source of inconsistency (SI); The SBWM is described using three numerical examples, and the hybrid QQM-SBWM approach is used to evaluate the life cycle of buildings, and the advantages of both methods are described; Sensitivity analysis is used to evaluate the robustness of the results of the proposed approach;.

Survey on the Developments of the BWM
The BWM
The SBWM
Consistency Measurement in SBWM
Numerical Examples
Example 1
Example 2
Example 3
Comparison of the results in Example
Determining the Importance of Buildings Life Cycle Assessment Criteria
Methodology
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.