Abstract

Quantifying spatially explicit or pixel-level aboveground forest biomass (AFB) across large regions is critical for measuring forest carbon sequestration capacity, assessing forest carbon balance, and revealing changes in the structure and function of forest ecosystems. When AFB is measured at the species level using widely available remote sensing data, regional changes in forest composition can readily be monitored. In this study, wall-to-wall maps of species-level AFB were generated for forests in Northeast China by integrating forest inventory data with Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) images and environmental variables through applying the optimal k-nearest neighbor (kNN) imputation model. By comparing the prediction accuracy of 630 kNN models, we found that the models with random forest (RF) as the distance metric showed the highest accuracy. Compared to the use of single-month MODIS data for September, there was no appreciable improvement for the estimation accuracy of species-level AFB by using multi-month MODIS data. When k > 7, the accuracy improvement of the RF-based kNN models using the single MODIS predictors for September was essentially negligible. Therefore, the kNN model using the RF distance metric, single-month (September) MODIS predictors and k = 7 was the optimal model to impute the species-level AFB for entire Northeast China. Our imputation results showed that average AFB of all species over Northeast China was 101.98 Mg/ha around 2000. Among 17 widespread species, larch was most dominant, with the largest AFB (20.88 Mg/ha), followed by white birch (13.84 Mg/ha). Amur corktree and willow had low AFB (0.91 and 0.96 Mg/ha, respectively). Environmental variables (e.g., climate and topography) had strong relationships with species-level AFB. By integrating forest inventory data and remote sensing data with complete spatial coverage using the optimal kNN model, we successfully mapped the AFB distribution of the 17 tree species over Northeast China. We also evaluated the accuracy of AFB at different spatial scales. The AFB estimation accuracy significantly improved from stand level up to the ecotype level, indicating that the AFB maps generated from this study are more suitable to apply to forest ecosystem models (e.g., LINKAGES) which require species-level attributes at the ecotype scale.

Highlights

  • Explicit or pixel-level aboveground forest biomass (AFB) information is increasingly needed for estimating forest carbon stocks at regional scales [1,2,3]

  • random forest (RF)-based k-nearest neighbor (kNN) models showed the best performance with largest T values and smallest generalized root mean squared distance (GRMSD) values for most of the combinations of k value and Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) predictor variables, followed closely by MSN- and GNN-based kNN models

  • The msnPP-based kNN models obviously showed the worst performance with smallest T values and largest GRMSD values (Figures 3 and 4)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Explicit or pixel-level aboveground forest biomass (AFB) information is increasingly needed for estimating forest carbon stocks at regional scales [1,2,3]. There are numerous methods developed to integrate forest inventory with remote sensing data to generate species-level maps over large spatial extent [10,11]. Most recently, based on the combinations of six distance metrics (RF, GNN, MSN, Euclidean, Mahalanobis and msnPP), 15 k values (1–15) and single- vs multi-month (MODIS) imagery, Zhang et al [22] compared the prediction accuracy of the 630 kNN models in mapping species-level biomass in Chinese boreal forests.

Forest Inventory Data
MODIS Data
Environmental Data
Optimizing kNN Models and Species-Level Biomass Imputation
Performance of Different kNN Models
Relationship between Environmental Variables and Species-Level AFB
Environmental Factors and Species Distribution
Imputation Accuracy and Limitations
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.