Abstract

Background: South Africa, as a signatory of the Convention on Biological Diversity, has an obligation to identify, prioritise and manage invasive species and their introduction pathways. However, this requires knowledge of the introduction pathways, factors influencing establishment success, invasive potential, current distributions and ecological impacts. Objectives: To evaluate the Fish Invasiveness Screening Kit (FISK) to predict the invasion risk posed by fish species proposed for introduction into South Africa. Method: FISK assessments were compiled for species whose invasion status in South Africa was known. A Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was conducted to calibrate the FISK for South Africa. The calibrated FISK was used to evaluate the risk that three species recently proposed for importation for aquaculture could become invasive in South Africa. Results: A FISK score of 14 was identified as the threshold to delineate between species that could become invasive in South Africa and those that are unlikely to become invasive. Of the three species evaluated, Silurus glanis had a high risk of becoming invasive in South Africa, Lates calcarifer was likely to be invasive and Oncorhynchus tshawytscha was unlikely to be invasive in South Africa. Conclusion: FISK was demonstrated to be a useful risk assessment tool to evaluate the invasion risk posed by species proposed for use in aquaculture. For the large number of fish imported for the pet trade, a rapid screening assessment to flag potentially high risk species was recommended prior to a full FISK assessment for flagged species.

Highlights

  • South Africa has a long history of vertebrate species importations (Picker & Griffiths 2017; van Rensburg et al 2011)

  • In this paper we evaluated whether the trait-based Fish Invasiveness Screening Kit (FISK) assessment is a suitable tool to evaluate the invasion risk posed by fish species imported into South Africa

  • To evaluate the utility of FISK, the 27 alien fish species recorded as having been released into water courses in South Africa and their evaluated invasion status listed in Ellender and Weyl (2014) were split into species considered invasive (n = 16; classified D and E; sensu Blackburn et al [2011]) and not invasive

Read more

Summary

Introduction

South Africa has a long history of vertebrate species importations (Picker & Griffiths 2017; van Rensburg et al 2011). Several publications have assessed the current knowledge of freshwater fish introductions in South Africa including introduction pathways (van Rensburg et al 2011), failed and successful introductions (Ellender & Weyl 2014), the ecological cost and economic benefit of established introductions, especially conflict species (Ellender et al 2014; Zengeya et al 2017), and the management options for established introduced fishes (Woodford et al 2017). South Africa, as a signatory of the Convention on Biological Diversity, has an obligation to identify, prioritise and manage invasive species and their introduction pathways This requires knowledge of the introduction pathways, factors influencing establishment success, invasive potential, current distributions and ecological impacts

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.