Abstract

As we strive to decarbonise our historic built environment, a balance must be struck between technical, aesthetic, philosophical and economic concerns. Compromises must be made and opportunities seized. At the same time, evaluation allows us to assess decisions previously made and reflect on their outcomes. This paper presents the evaluation of the refurbishment of The Old Mayor’s Parlour, Church Street, Hereford, a historic timber-framed building now used as a gallery and exhibition space. The conservation work undertaken was not specifically envisioned as an energy retrofit, however the necessary replacement of failing concrete block infill, the legacy of a 1970s renovation, allowed improvements to be made to the thermal performance of the external envelope. Environmental monitoring and digital simulation have been used to assess the impact of these interventions. In situ U-value measurements show the success of the replacement infill panels and associated internal lining, although digital energy simulations suggest a limited improvement to the building’s overall energy efficiency. At the same time thermography suggests a potential threat of increased condensation risk to the uninsulated ornate 17th century plaster ceiling. The results of this paper show the risk of unintended consequences and the challenges faced by sustainable building conservation.

Highlights

  • The retrofit of our existing building stock has been identified as a key factor in achieving international goals for mitigating climate change [1]

  • This paper presents the evaluation of the refurbishment of The Old Mayor’s Parlour, Church Street, Hereford, a historic timber-framed building used as a gallery and exhibition space

  • The results of this paper show the risk of unintended consequences and the challenges faced by sustainable building conservation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The retrofit of our existing building stock has been identified as a key factor in achieving international goals for mitigating climate change [1]. This has been reflected in policy by both the EU [2] and the UK governments [3]. At the same time, building owners and occupants wish to improve the thermal comfort of their properties and reduce heating bills. As such, both the extent and detail of any retrofit remains at the discretion of the building owner.

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call