Evaluating effects of silvicultural treatments on forest canopy structure outcomes

Abstract

Traditional forest management can homogenize forests, and management strategies that can restore complexity and promote adaptive capacity to global change are needed. However, effects of different silvicultural practices on complexity of forest structural components, such as the canopy, are not well understood mechanistically. We conducted a coupled field and simulation-modeling study to evaluate: 1) how near-term effects of silviculture on canopy structure and complexity differ across treatment types, and 2) how outcomes of common silvicultural treatments compare to a spectrum of randomly implemented removals. Thirteen different silvicultural treatments replicated across 12 study plots were simulated within 3D models derived from terrestrial lidar data. Treatment types often differed in their multi-dimensional structural outcomes, including vertical heterogeneity and canopy structural complexity. Moderate intensity thinning treatments that preferentially removed smaller trees increased near-term canopy structural complexity, while diameter-limit cutting often reduced complexity. Silvicultural treatments collectively produced a wide range of residual canopy conditions; however, variability among structural outcomes within individual treatment types or categories was limited relative to the range of possible outcomes from random removals. Most treatments induced shifts in canopy structure outside the spectrum of random removal, suggesting ample space for adapting management to promote forest heterogeneity.