Abstract
I find this article on computer-assisted career guidance (CACG) systems a welcome one. As the authors point out (Sampson, Reardon, Humphreys, Peterson, Evans, & Domkowski, 1990), the prospective buyer of such a system is faced not only with a number of disparate, changing systems but also with the fact that there is a lengthy publishing time lag for research and evaluation related to CACG systems. The authors have sought to alleviate this problem by comparing nine CACG systems on the basis of their features and their costs. The purpose of this paper is to critique the differential featurecost approach from the standpoint of the prospective buyer of a CACG system to be used in a counseling setting.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
