Abstract
With the rise of big spatial data, many systems were developed on Hadoop, Spark, Storm, Flink, and similar big data systems to handle big spatial data. At the core of all these systems, they use a computational geometry library to represent points, lines, and polygons, and to process them to evaluate spatial predicates and spatial analysis queries. This paper evaluates four computational geometry libraries to assess their suitability for various workloads in big spatial data exploration, namely, GEOS, JTS, Esri Geometry API, and GeoLite. The latter is a library that we built specifically for this paper to test some ideas that are not present in other libraries. For all the four libraries, we evaluate their computational efficiency and memory usage using a combination of micro- and macro-benchmarks on Spark. The paper gives recommendations on how to use these libraries for big spatial data exploration.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.