Abstract
Land cover mapping of large areas is challenging due to the significant volume of satellite data to acquire and process, as well as the lack of spatial continuity due to cloud cover. Temporal aggregation—the use of metrics (i.e., mean or median) derived from satellite data over a period of time—is an approach that benefits from recent increases in the frequency of free satellite data acquisition and cloud-computing power. This enables the efficient use of multi-temporal data and the exploitation of cloud-gap filling techniques for land cover mapping. Here, we provide the first formal comparison of the accuracy between land cover maps created with temporal aggregation of Sentinel-1 (S1), Sentinel-2 (S2), and Landsat-8 (L8) data from one-year and test whether this method matches the accuracy of traditional approaches. Thirty-two datasets were created for Wales by applying automated cloud-masking and temporally aggregating data over different time intervals, using Google Earth Engine. Manually processed S2 data was used for comparison using a traditional two-date composite approach. Supervised classifications were created, and their accuracy was assessed using field-based data. Temporal aggregation only matched the accuracy of the traditional two-date composite approach (77.9%) when an optimal combination of optical and radar data was used (76.5%). Combined datasets (S1, S2 or S1, S2, and L8) outperformed single-sensor datasets, while datasets based on spectral indices obtained the lowest levels of accuracy. The analysis of cloud cover showed that to ensure at least one cloud-free pixel per time interval, a maximum of two intervals per year for temporal aggregation were possible with L8, while three or four intervals could be used for S2. This study demonstrates that temporal aggregation is a promising tool for integrating large amounts of data in an efficient way and that it can compensate for the lower quality of automatic image selection and cloud masking. It also shows that combining data from different sensors can improve classification accuracy. However, this study highlights the need for identifying optimal combinations of satellite data and aggregation parameters in order to match the accuracy of manually selected and processed image composites.
Highlights
Land cover maps help us better understand environmental processes, such as water and biochemical cycles, energy exchanges, or biodiversity alterations [1]
This is because the study area is divided into two orbit paths of the S2 satellite, meaning that mthaepds.aTtehaisndis nbuecmabuesre othf eimstaugdeyacaqreuaisiistidonivsidfoerdthinetsoettwwooorrebgiitopnastdhisffoefr.thIne tSh2issacatesleli,tteh,emeeaasnteirnngothrbaitt RteshmheootdewSasetnefse.aw2n01de9r,nc1u1lo,m2u8bd8e-rfroefeiimmaaggeesa,clqeuadisiintigontos tfhore tchreesaetiotwnoofrethgiios npsatdtiefrfner
One of the challenges in producing land cover maps of large areas is the inconsistency in the numbOenreofocfltohuedc-fhraeellepnixgeelss ianvapirlaobdluecoivnegrlaanpdericoodveorf tmimape.sIonfthlairsgsetuadrye,atshiesdtihffeerinencocenssiisntethnecynuinmtbheer nouf mclobuerd-offreceloiumda-gfreeseppeirxeplisxealvoaivlaebr lae yoevaerr wa epreeriaondaloyfsetdimteo. eIvnatlhuiastesttuhdeye, ftfhecetsdiofnfertehnecteesminpotrhael nagugmrbegeratoiofncloofuLd8-farneed iSm2adgaetsa.pFeorrptihxeeldoavtaerasaseysesaerd winetrheisanstaulydsye,dtotoenesvuarleuaatteletahset oenffeecctlsouodn-ftrheee temporal aggregation of L8 and S2 data
Summary
Land cover maps help us better understand environmental processes, such as water and biochemical cycles, energy exchanges, or biodiversity alterations [1]. The UK Land Cover Map 2015 (LCM2015), a national land cover map which classified two-date image composites over the course of a year, used over 100 Landsat images, each of which required manual cloud-masking. This volume of data requires a large amount of storage, together with significant computing power and time. Acquiring complete spatial coverage for cloudy areas of the world requires the use of numerous partially cloudy images. This increases the number of images that must be obtained, stored, and processed
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
