Evaluating brain volume segmentation accuracy and reliability of FreeSurfer and Neurophet AQUA at variations in MRI magnetic field strengths.

Abstract

We aimed to compare the accuracy and reliability of two segmentation tools for magnetic resonance (MR) volumetry (FreeSurfer and Neurophet AQUA) at two magnetic field strengths (1.5T and 3T). We included 101 patients for the 1.5T-3T dataset and 112 for the 3T-3T dataset from three hospitals and five open-source datasets. The mean volume difference and average volume difference percentage with the change in magnetic field strength were compared between the methods. The hippocampus volume was larger with FreeSurfer than the Neurophet AQUA. In most brain regions, the Neurophet AQUA yielded a smaller average volume difference percentage (all < 10%) than FreeSurfer (all > 10%). The Neurophet AQUA exhibited more stable connectivity and regularity of the segmented components. Regarding volume, the Neurophet AQUA had effect sizes and ICCs comparable to those of FreeSurfer across the magnetic field strengths. With FreeSurfer, the original volume difference was small, whereas the average volume difference percentage was small with the Neurophet AQUA. Image segmentation took 1h with FreeSurfer and 5min with the Neurophet AQUA. When choosing an automatic segmentation method, the differences in image processing time and volume variability due to changes in the magnetic field strength of these methods should be considered.