Evaluating biometrics by using a hybrid MCDM model

Abstract

Biometrics has been developing for decades in diverse industries, such as consumer electronics, internet of things, financial industry, etc. The purpose of this research is to build a decision-making model to evaluate and improve the performances of biometrics for administrators to design and make suitable biometric systems. This paper adopts a hybrid multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) model, comprising decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL), and DEMATEL-based analytic network process (called DANP) to probe into the interrelationship and influential weights among criteria of biometrics. According to DEMATEL technique, the empirical results indicate that criteria of biometrics have self-effect relationships. The dimension of biometrics that administrators of biometrics should enhance first when improving the performances is usability. The criterion of universality with the highest influencing value to systematically affect all other evaluation factors is what administrators of biometrics should comprehensively consider. In the top three criteria for evaluation by DANP, biometric systems with the most influential weight is the criterion that can be improved to have higher recognition rates for increasing the performances of biometrics, followed by biometric conditions and permanence.