Abstract
Kenya faces a number of challenges in countering anti-money laundering (AML) activities and developing appropriate policy measures to avert and contain the adverse socioeconomic consequences of money laundering. Through textual documentation, direct observation and semi-structured interviews, this article outlines the findings of a study about the awareness and attitudes of key Kenyan stakeholder groups towards recent anti-money laundering legislation. Invoking Brown, Tower and Taplin's (2004) typology of financially classified stakeholder groups, this study finds that the proposed anti-money laundering legislation raises a number of diverse views on Kenyan AML initiatives that makes carrying out the results of an evaluation of the AML legislation highly problematic.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
