Abstract

Although for many solar physics problems the desirable or meaningful boundary is the radial component of the magnetic field $B_{\mathrm {r}}$ , the most readily available measurement is the component of the magnetic field along the line of sight to the observer, $B_{\mathrm {los}}$ . As this component is only equal to the radial component where the viewing angle is exactly zero, some approximation is required to estimate $B_{\mathrm {r}}$ at all other observed locations. In this study, a common approximation known as the “ $\mu$ -correction”, which assumes all photospheric field to be radial, is compared to a method that invokes computing a potential field that matches the observed $B_{\mathrm {los}}$ , from which the potential field radial component, $B_{\mathrm {r}}^{\mathrm {pot}}$ is recovered. We demonstrate that in regions that are truly dominated by a radially oriented field at the resolution of the data employed, the $\mu$ -correction performs acceptably if not better than the potential-field approach. However, it is also shown that for any solar structure that includes horizontal fields, i.e. active regions, the potential-field method better recovers both the strength of the radial field and the location of magnetic neutral line.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.