Abstract

BackgroundThe Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R) evaluates the patient-reported quality of pain management in adults. A validated APS-POQ-R is pivotal to guide effective pain management with better patient satisfaction. Previous studies revealed that subscales of “patients’ perception of pain management” were unstable cross-culturally. This study aims to evaluate the construct validity of the APS-POQ-R in gynecological postoperative patients with a multi-cultural background using confirmatory factor analysis to allow comparisons among different a priori models at the latent factor level.MethodsPatients aged 18 years old or above and who were scheduled for gynecology surgery were selected. Three different models with a combination of latent factors were based on a priori hypotheses from previous studies. The root-mean-squared error of approximation, comparative fit index, Tucker-Lewis Index, Chi-squared test, and change in Chi-squared statistic given a change in degrees of freedom between models were used to assess the model fit to the present data.ResultsA total of 302 patients completed the questionnaire. The five-factor model which was based on Gordon’s study has an acceptable fit for the data and was superior when compared to the one-factor baseline model. Although the four-factor model, which originated from Botti’s study, also demonstrates a good model fit, the “perception of care” construct was excluded in this model. The “perception of care” construct is conceptually important as patient-centered care has become the focus of quality improvement of pain service.ConclusionsThe APS-POQ-R is easy to administer and is useful for quality evaluation in postoperative pain management. The present study demonstrates that a five-factor structure of the APS-POQ-R is the best fitting model in our patient sample. The results of this study provide further evidence to support the use of APS-POQ-R as a measurement tool for pain management evaluation in acute postoperative patients with a multi-cultural background.

Highlights

  • The Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R) evaluates the patient-reported quality of pain management in adults

  • The present study demonstrates that a five-factor structure of the Acute Pain Service (APS)-POQ-R is the best fitting model in our patient sample

  • The results of this study provide further evidence to support the use of APSPOQ-R as a measurement tool for pain management evaluation in acute postoperative patients with a multicultural background

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R) evaluates the patient-reported quality of pain management in adults. Besides monitoring of clinical outcomes, continual evaluation of the patientreported outcome in the quality of pre- and post-operative pain management is pivotal to guide an effective health care delivery with a high level of patient satisfaction. For this purpose, a validated and standard quality improvement (QI) measure is essential. The Revised Acute Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R) could be a useful tool to measure the quality of pain management for QI purposes. While the original factor solution in that study showed a high degree of internal consistency, subsequent studies in various cohorts reviewed a range of factor solutions and patterns of item distribution [6,7,8]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call