Abstract

ObjectiveTo determine the utility and viability of a chronic care program. DesignCross-sectional descriptive study with qualitative and quantitative evaluation. Setting and participants26 primary care teams (PCT) from the Catalan health service of Gerona. Interventions20 projects within the program. Start 2011. Main outcome measuresThe degree of development of the program, consensus indicators for chronic care, and the Instrument for the Assessment of Chronic Care Models (Instrumento de Evaluación de Modelos de Atención ante la Cronicidad [IEMAC]). ResultsEvaluation of the degree of development: 75% of projects were partially or fully implemented, with a high degree of development in 71% of the PCT. An increasing tendency was found in the consensus indicators for process (patients contacted 48 hours after hospital discharge, population attended in chronic care programs and with the highest risk stratification). There was a slight decrease in the consensus indicators for effectiveness (readmissions, mean length of hospital stay, avoidable hospital admissions, pharmaceutical expenditure, patients attended in the emergency department, and mortality). The dimensions receiving the highest scores on the IEMAC were those evaluating information systems and clinical decision support, while those receiving the lowest scores were community health and self-care. ConclusionsWhen assessing the utility of CRONIGICAT, we believe that progress has been made mainly in its implantation, which has acted as a catalyst for a self-directed shift to a better chronic care model and has identified areas for improvement. We believe that the CRONIGICAT is viable and sustainable, since its actions and projects are integrated within routine clinical practice.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call