Abstract

ObjectiveThe implementation of clinical practice guidelines is limited due to the lack of tools to carry out audits and provide feedback to the health professionals. In this study, an evaluation is performed using the automated (EXEMED) tool in order to assess the adherence to clinical practice guidelines from the information entered in the electronic health records. MethodsThe adherence to 5 recommendations contained in the heart failure clinical practice guidelines was evaluated in a group of 35 patients admitted to the Hospital Universitario San Ignacio between January 2016 and March 2016. The automated EXEMED tool was used to assess this, by comparing the results obtained with the evaluation carried out by an independent medical committee. The kappa coefficient was used to determine the agreement between the two methods. ResultsThe adherence to the different recommendations varied between 0%, for the determination of the abdominal circumference, up to 97%, for the use of beta-blockers at discharge. Percentage agreement between the two evaluation methods was above 90% for all the recommendations. The kappa for the different recommendations was 0.78 (95% CI; 0.62-0.95) and 0.64 (0.48-0.80). The evaluation time was reduced from 20minutes to 2minutes with the use of the EXEMED tool. ConclusionsEXEMED is a valid and effective tool in the evaluation of adherence to clinical practice guidelines. Further studies are required to assess the impact of its used associated with feedback to the clinicians, in the long-term outcomes of patients with heart failure.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call