Abstract
Swedish fire protection regulations are very strict and their application - especially when they require structural alteration - involves considerable costs. Despite that strictness, people are injured or lose their lives in buildings which comply with the regulations of the law. Can it be that these regulations are built on behavioral assumptions which don't agree with the actual acting of man? Fire protection regulations have grown out of usage and of experience with "disasters". They seldom use knowledge from behavioral science or building function analysis. Our aim is to provide such knowledge by observing peoples' actual behavior in evacuation exercises. Evacuation plans are drawn up for a lot of buildings. Underlying all such plans there are also assumptions as to how people will behave when danger threatens. By analyzing the course of events in evacuation drills we think that the possibility of judging whether the assumptions about behavior are correct will improve. An evacuation drill makes the participants aware of the fact that there are evacuation problems and that there may be obstacles for a safe evacuation. Documentation and evaluation of evacuation exercises is important so the experiences from the exercise can be servable to more than the participants.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
