Abstract
Abstract 3769 Background:Until recently, prognosis of pts with CML treated with TKI was based on scores developed in the chemotherapy and interferon era. Hasford and colleagues [Blood. 2011;(118):686–692] have identified the EUTOS score, using the percentage of basophils and spleen size, as a significant tool to predict the probability of achieving 18-month complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) and progression-free survival in patients treated with imatinib. Aims:To validate the EUTOS score in an independent MDACC cohort of pts, with early CML-CP treated with standard-dose imatinib, high-dose imatinib, dasatinib, and nilotinib, and its ability to predict transformation-free survival (TFS), event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS). Methods:465 consecutive pts with newly diagnosed CML–CP (0 – 6 months from diagnosis to TKI treatment) were treated with imatinib 400 mg daily (n=71), imatinib 800 mg daily (n=208), and 2nd TKIs (n=186; dasatinib n=88, nilotinib n=98) in sequential phase II trials. Entry criteria were similar for all trials. EUTOS score = (7 x basophils %) + (4 x spleen cm BCM). A EUTOS score of >87 indicates high-risk and ≤87 low-risk. Results:465 pts with CML-CP were assessed. Median age was 47 years (range, 15–85). Median time from diagnosis to TKI therapy was 1 month (range, 0 to 6). 319 (69%), 112 (24%), and 34 (7%) pts were in low, intermediate, and high-Sokal score category, respectively. Median basophils percentage at baseline was 3 (range, 0 to 19). Median splenomegaly size was 0 cm (range, 0 to 30). 118 pts (25%) received previous cytoreduction therapy. Median follow-up was 117 months (range, 16 to 130) for pts receiving standard-dose imatinib, 88 months (range, 4 to 118) for those receiving high-dose imatinib, and 30 months (range, 3 to 69) for those receiving 2nd TKI. The overall CCyR rates were 87%, 91%, and 95%, respectively. The 4-year EFS, TFS, and OS rates for the whole group were 84%, 94%, and 95%, respectively. Overall, of the 465 pts, 427 (92%) were in low EUTOS score category (Table 1). Pts with low EUTOS score had higher rates of CCyR at anytime compared to pts with high EUTOS score (93% versus 81%, p=0.02). This difference was mainly significant among pts receiving 2nd TKI (p=0.03) while it was not different among pts receiving imatinib (p=0.27). There was no difference in the rates of major molecular response (85% versus 81%, p=0.48) between pts with low and high EUTOS score. There was no difference in TFS, EFS, and OS rates between pts with low and high EUTOS score, overall and among specific therapy (Table 1). Conclusion:Eight percent of pts with CML-CP treated at MDACC are of high EUTOS score. In this population, the EUTOS score was not predictive for overall MMR, TFS, EFS, and OS.ParameterOverallLow EUTOS scoreHigh EUTOS scorep-valueN=465427 (92%)38 (8%)CCyR (%)Overall (evaluable=454)9293810.02 Imatinib9091820.27 400 mg87861001.0 800 mg9192790.082nd TKI9596800.03MMR (%)Overall (evaluable=452)8585810.48 Imatinib8485820.76 400 mg78771001.0 800 mg8687790.302nd TKI8686800.464-year EFS (%)Overall8484810.71 Imatinib8182720.20 400 mg7880500.34 800 mg8283760.292nd TKI89881000.164-year TFS (%)Overall9494970.51 Imatinib9393940.33 400 mg8990670.47 800 mg94931000.462nd TKI97971000.534-year OS (%)Overall95951000.88 Imatinib94941000.75 400 mg93921000.34 800 mg95941000.322nd TKI99991000.64 Disclosures:Cortes:BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.