EUTHANASIA AND THE COUNTRIES WHICH POSITIVELY REGULATED ACTIVE EUTHANASIA

Abstract

Objectives: The main objective of this article is to provide a comprehensive understanding of Euthanasia, also known as mercy-killing, and its various forms. It also aims to discuss the moral and legal implications of Euthanasia, which differ across countries, and examine the statutory frameworks of jurisdictions where Active Euthanasia has been legalized. Methods: The article outlines the concept of Euthanasia and categorizes its different genres. It then focuses on the statutory regulations in countries where Active Euthanasia has been positively regulated, analyzing the legal frameworks that govern the practice. Results: The study reveals that while mercy is central to Euthanasia, the moral perceptions of the practice differ significantly between countries. There is no international consensus on the legality and morality of Euthanasia, with certain jurisdictions adopting laws to regulate Active Euthanasia, whereas others continue to oppose it. Conclusion: The article concludes that despite the variance in legal and moral perspectives, Euthanasia remains a complex and controversial topic. The differences in statutory regulations across countries reflect the diverse approaches to dealing with the ethical dilemma of mercy-killing, with some nations embracing regulation and others maintaining resistance.