Abstract
. The 2020 presidential elections in Belarus were characterised by widely recognised human rights violations. The European Union decided not to recognise the results after important declarations and consultations among its leaders. However, the European Union and Belarus were engaged in a structured human rights dialogue. The author discusses the links between the human rights dialogue as a foreign policy instrument and the dynamics around the 2020 presidential elections in Belarus. The hypothesis stresses that the evolution of the bilateral dialogues provides information on the developments within the relations between the European Union and Belarus. The case study, based on extensive analysis of official documents, finds additional support for the claim against the effectiveness of the human right s dialogues with third parties. Apart from a better understanding and a channel of dialogue with the country, the human rights topics recreated an environment in which it justified the return to restrictions and sanctions against individuals involved in illegitimate actions. The historical analysis of the presidential elections, particularly the climate around their organisation, the assessment of the human rights dialogues as a policy tool, and the analysis of the official dialogues on the thematic areas of concerns from the human rights dialogues support this hypothesis.
Highlights
A case study on the human rights dialogues with Belarus is highlighted to improve the understanding of the thematic areas of the dialogue, its effects and to what extent the Belarusian presidential elections crisis could have been predicted based on the public information we have on the human rights situation in Belarus
The recent developments following the 2020 presidential elections in Belarus solidify the arguments against the ineffectiveness of the human rights dialogues with third parties
Fundamental rights and electoral rights have been on the agenda of the European Union - Belarus human rights dialogues since 2009, yet this ‘quiet diplomacy’ did not deliver results
Summary
Human rights dialogue, European Union, foreign policy, presidential elections A case study on the human rights dialogues with Belarus is highlighted to improve the understanding of the thematic areas of the dialogue, its effects and to what extent the Belarusian presidential elections crisis could have been predicted based on the public information we have on the human rights situation in Belarus.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
