Abstract

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with sphincterotomy and stone extraction is the treatment of choice for choledocholithiasis, reaching a successful clearance of the common bile duct (CBD) in up to 90% of the cases. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has the best diagnostic accuracy for CBD stones, its sensitivity and specificity range being 89–94% and 94–95%, respectively. Traditionally seen as two separate entities, the two worlds of EUS and ERCP have recently come together under the new discipline of bilio-pancreatic endoscopy. Nevertheless, the complexity of both EUS and ERCP led the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy to identify quality in endoscopy as a top priority in its recent EUS and ERCP curriculum recommendations. The clinical benefits of performing EUS and ERCP in the same session are several, such as benefiting from real-time information from EUS, having one single sedation for both the diagnosis and the treatment of biliary stones, reducing the risk of cholangitis/acute pancreatitis while waiting for ERCP after the EUS diagnosis, and ultimately shortening the hospital stay and costs while preserving patients’ outcomes. Potential candidates for the same session approach include patients at high risk for CBD stones, symptomatic individuals with status post-cholecystectomy, pregnant women, and those unfit for surgery. This narrative review discusses the main technical aspects and evidence from the literature about EUS and ERCP in the management of choledocholithiasis.

Highlights

  • Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with sphincterotomy and stone extraction is the treatment of choice for choledocholithiasis, reaching a successful clearance of the common bile duct (CBD) in up to 90% of cases with relatively low morbidity [1]

  • The ESGE maintains that interventional Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and ERCP are associated with the highest risk of serious complications and mortality among all the endoscopic procedures [12]

  • In between the two categories, there was a vast group of patients at intermediate-risk for CBD stones, for whom many tests were recommended including EUS or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography to detect CBD stones and assess the need for ERCP

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with sphincterotomy and stone extraction is the treatment of choice for choledocholithiasis, reaching a successful clearance of the common bile duct (CBD) in up to 90% of cases with relatively low morbidity (about 5%) [1]. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has the best diagnostic accuracy for CBD stones with both radial and linear echoendoscopes, with sensitivity and specificity ranging 89–94%. Modern endoscopists are very often skilled in both techniques, which they use either in conjunction or alternatively to obtain the best possible outcomes. The purpose of this narrative review is to highlight and discuss the main technical aspects and evidence from the literature about EUS and ERCP in the management of choledocholithiasis

EUS and ERCP Curriculum
Management of Choledocholithias
EUS and ERCP in the Same Session
Overcoming ERCP Limitations with EUS
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call