Abstract
ABSTRACT Delivering an appropriate student workload is important for quality higher education, especially for curriculum design, student well-being and success in studies. Academic credit systems are being increasingly used to determine workload for higher education studies. However, they rely on presumptions about workload, which educational theory and research do not always substantiate. A key example is the European Credit Transfer and Accumulation System (ECTS), which awards credits to students for their academic achievements and the related workload that is measured in study time. This article examines the ECTS from the perspective of its conceptualisation of workload and compares it to earlier research on student workload. Based on a literature review and conceptual analysis, a student workload model is presented and compared to the operating principles of ECTS. In conclusion, ECTS relies on a misleading conceptualisation of student workload with far-reaching implications for higher education research, policy and practice. Recommendations for informed applications and further development of ECTS are presented.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
