Abstract
Having failed to identify local energy supplies compliant with Kyoto Protocol obligations, the EU turned to Africa in the 21st C. According to definition, the term ‘renewable energy’ source equally describes slaves, forests and rivers. Environmental history analysis demonstrates the 1) poverty of economic analysis; 2) inadequacies of short-term and local check-list style of environmental impact assessment; and 3) parallels between the social violence of the trans-Atlantic slave trade and the environmental violence of conventional renewable energy technologies. Technological innovation and development enabled separation of electricity production from its use, obscuring social and environmental effects. Neo-liberal economics’ shift in electricity's definition from public good to commodity promoted gigantic environmental interventions with complex and unanticipated consequences. The 21st C requires more nuanced evaluation by Africans of energy production technologies and export policies, while Europeans make concerted efforts to control - and reduce - demand.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
