Abstract

Floods have the potential to cause fatalities, displacement of people and damage to the environment, to severely compromise economic development and to undermine the economic activities of the Community. The EU Directive on the assessment and management of flood risks [2007/60/EC] was adopted on 23 October 2007. Its aim is to reduce and manage the risks that floods pose to human health, the environment, cultural heritage and economic activity. The paper reflects on how the requirements of the Flood Directive had been achieved in Austria and how the nationwide comparability and transferability of results as well as the international coordination had been obtained. Austria as a state has its competences structured in different departments as well as administrational levels. Besides administrational characteristics there is also a high diversity in topographical boundary conditions from Alpine areas to lowland areas emphasising different approaches and foci of flood risk management. To harmonise the related interests a discussion and decision committee had been established. The resolutions of this committee then defined the basis for a national coordination procedure where the Federal Ministry provided a federal blueprint to the provinces. The provinces then incorporated their regional and local information and data. Based on this response the coordinated and nationwide comparable Flood Risk Management Plans had been set up and had been forwarded to public information and consultation. Complementary stakeholder involvement has been ensured by information and discussion workshops throughout the entire process. The administrational and topographical characteristics to be considered in the frame of FD implementation strengthened the coordination and harmonisation across all sectors and stakeholders related to flood risk management. The FD implementation, therefore, is a holistic attempt to outline the needs for action for all sectors related to risk management. The obligation of reviewing the process on a regular basis and to revise the information if needed supports a sustainable approach by discussing the achievements and deficits transparently. The consideration of residual risk (overload and failure of flood defences) and, hence, the incorporation to national legislation is of substantial relevance especially for awareness raising and public information and consultation. Concluding the implementation of the FD is very valuable for strategic planning (mid-term) on national level which is then linked to existing and well-proven mechanisms of detailed planning and funding. The priorities are set on non-structural measures as well as measures fostering flood retention.

Highlights

  • In the frame of implementing the EU Floods Directive in Austria there are two major aspects to be considered

  • Austria as a federal state has it¶s competences structured in different levels of administration: Second, there is a high topographical diversity to be considered in developing uniform and comparable methods for the Floods Directive implementation subdivided in Alpine Pre-Alpine Lowland

  • The EU Directive on the assessment and management of flood risks [2007/60/EC], often referred to as the μ)ORRGV¶ 'LUHFWLYH ZDV DGRSWHG RQ 2FWREHU,WV aim is to reduce and manage the risks that floods pose to human health, the environment, cultural heritage and economic activity

Read more

Summary

Setting the Scene

In the frame of implementing the EU Floods Directive in Austria there are two major aspects to be considered. Austria as a federal state has it¶s competences structured in different levels of administration: Second, there is a high topographical diversity to be considered in developing uniform and comparable methods for the Floods Directive implementation subdivided in Alpine Pre-Alpine Lowland

Federal Provinces
Coordination and harmonisation in Austria
Investments in flood protection in Austria
Results of the Floods Directive implementation in Austria
FHRM in Austria
FRMP in Austria
Links between FD and WFD in Austria
Experience and lessons learnt
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.