Abstract
Etodolac, a racemic (LR) nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drug (NSAID), has higher gastric safety compared to other conventional NSAIDs. However, it remains unknown whether the LR etodolac shows less adverse action in the small intestine. In the present study, we examined the effect of etodolac, both L/R and the enantiomers (S and R) on the gastric and small intestinal mucosa. Methods: Male SD rats were used. Etodolac (5‐50 mg/kg), both LR, S and R, was given p.o. in 18 h‐fasted or non‐fasted rats, and the stomach or the small intestine was examined for lesions 4 or 24 h later, respectively. Results: LR‐etodolac and S‐etodolac dose‐dependently caused lesions in both the stomach and small intestine, yet the effect of the former was much less potent compared to the latter. R‐etodolac did not cause damage even at 50 mg/kg. On the other hand, pretreatment with R‐etodolac dose‐dependently prevented the development of gastric lesions induced by indomethacin. The mucosal PGE2 content in the stomach and small intestine was significantly decreased by both LR‐etodolac and S‐etodolac, but not R‐etodolac. Conclusion: These results suggest that LR‐etodolac has less ulcerogenic properties in the gastrointestinal mucosa and showed that this safety profile of LR‐etodolac may be explained by the mucosal protective action of R‐etodolac.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.