Abstract
[full article and abstract in Lithuanian; abstract in English]
 This article discusses the usage of ethnonyms denoting Latvians, Lithuanians and Russians in 16–17th century Latvian texts that are included in the Corpus of Early Latvian Texts. The objective of this article is to analyze the details of how these ethnonyms are used in these texts, the meanings attributed to them (especially in the case of ethnonyms denoting Lithuanians and Russians) and the differences from their usage in folklore.
 It is concluded that latvietis and latvis – two ethnonyms denoting Latvians – can be found in texts (including unpublished manuscripts) dating back as early as the 17th century. The majority of them are practical texts, such as dictionaries, but there are original religious texts addressed to Latvians themselves, too – e.g., Eernst Glück’s preface to his New Testament translation of 1685, or the sermon books by Georg Mancelius.
 The ethnonyms denoting Lithuanians – such as leitis, lietaviets and lietavnieks – also appear in 17th century dictionaries, occasionally also in the sermons by Mancelius. However, it is not always possible to tell whether these terms are used to denote an ethnicity or the inhabitants of the respective country. Unlike Latvian folksongs, the 17th century texts never use the ethnonym leiši to refer to Latvians.
 Regarding the ethnonym denoting Russians in the early Latvian texts, there are several differences from the usage of denotations of Latvians and Lithuanians: 1) The word krievs (“Russian”) appears already in the 16th century; 2) It is included not only in the first Latvian lexicographical sources and in original religious texts (for instance the sermon books), but also in translated religious texts, where it has been employed as an equivalent of the ethnonyms used in the original texts; 3) In the 17th century, the word krievs has sometimes been included in compound botanic terms denoting plants introduced from other countries.
Highlights
This article discusses the usage of ethnonyms denoting Latvians, Lithuanians and Russians in 16–17th century Latvian texts that are included in the Corpus of Early Latvian Texts
It is concluded that latvietis and latvis – two ethnonyms denoting Latvians – can be found in texts dating back as early as the 17th century
The majority of them are practical texts, such as dictionaries, but there are original religious texts addressed to Latvians themselves, too – e.g., Eernst Glück’s preface to his New Testament translation of 1685, or the sermon books by Georg Mancelius
Summary
Rusų įvardijimų vartojimas latvių kalbos senuosiuose tekstuose, palyginti su latvių ir lietuvių etnonimų vartosena, kiek skiriasi: 1) žodis krievs minimas XVI a., 2) šis etnonimas yra patekęs ne tik 168 baltų kalbų tekstų ir žodžių reikšmės į pirmuosius latvių leksikografinius šaltinius ir tiesiogiai latviams skirtus originalius religinio turinio tekstus (ypač pamokslų knygas), bet ir į religinius tekstus, verstus iš kitų kalbų, – atsižvelgiant į to meto istorines sąlygas, originaliuose tekstuose esantys etnonimai buvo keičiami žodžiu krievs, 3) žodžio dalis kriev- XVII a. Kaip yra pastebėjęs Bušas (2013, 18, 19), pirmieji latvių pavadinimai spausdintuose tekstuose pasirodė XVII a. Kalbant apie oficialųjį dabartinių laikų pavadinimą latvietis, reikia paminėti, kad tai pirmasis tiek rankraštiniuose, tiek spausdintuose tekstuose (bent jau iš LVSTK esančių šaltinių) užfiksuotas latvių etnonimas.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
