Abstract
Philippe van Parijs' case for a basic income attempts at convincing the moral philosopher and the concerned citizen, both at once. In case it happened, the theory of justice in the rawlsian tradition, as applied to basic income implementation, would have proven its political performance. In this paper, 1 contend that, in order to make his case, van Parijs brings down political debate to reflective equilibrium, excluding prudential considerations, on the one hand, and leaving sentimental education as the only available alternative, on the other, for those who resist the cogency of his arguments. Is this enough to steer clear of Penguins Island?
Highlights
Philippe van Parijs' case for a basic income attempts at convincing the moral philosopher and the concerned citi" zen, both at once
Se trataba de efectuar un «sondeo cualitativo» que descubriese opiniones independientes sobre el porvenir del trabajo expresadas en apenas una docena de folios (VVAA, 1984, p. 5)
En estas páginas trataremos de presentar el desarrollo argumental de la Renta Básica a través de un examen de las disputas en torno a la obra del filósofo lava" niense Philippe van Parijs, promotor de aquel primer manifiesto y, posteriormente, autor de toda una teoría de la justicia encaminada a justificar la propuesta
Summary
Philippe van Parijs' case for a basic income attempts at convincing the moral philosopher and the concerned citi" zen, both at once. Más bien, examinar los nexos entre la concepción de la filosofía defendida por van Parijs y sus argumentos éticos en favor de la bondad política de la renta básica.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
