Abstract
A striking legacy of the attempt of the South African govern ment to use imposed ethnic categories as a basis for apartheid has been an overwhelming rejection by the subordinate communities of the use of ethnicity as the basis in any shape or form for political rights. This is in sharp contrast to the demands for the political recognition of ethnic rights being made elsewhere in the world. Attempts by Lijphart and others to apply consociationalism or other models of power-sharing to South Africa have failed fully to come to terms with the strength of hostility to the use of ethnic categories by the subordinate communities, reflected in the dominant influence of the African National Congress's ideology of non- racialism. This is not to deny that ethnicity has played a role in political divisions among Blacks. In conclusion, it is argued that South Africa's case shows that placing an exclusively ethnic interpretation on political events can be just as misleading as ignoring the potential political influence of ethnicity.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.