Abstract

BackgroundAlthough the prevalence of child stunting is falling in Latin America, socioeconomic inequalities persist. However, there is limited evidence on ethnic disparities. We aimed to describe ethnic inequalities of stunting and feeding practices in thirteen Latin American countries using recent nationally representative surveys.MethodsWe analyzed national surveys carried out since 2006. Based on self-reported ethnicity, skin color or language, children were classified into three categories: indigenous/ afrodescendant/reference group (European or mixed ancestry). Stunting was defined as height (length)-for-age < − 2 standard deviations relative to WHO standards. Family wealth was assessed through household asset indices. We compared mean length/height-for-age and prevalence of stunting among the three ethnic groups.ResultsThirteen surveys had information on indigenous and seven on afrodescendants. In all countries, the average length/height-for-age was significantly lower for indigenous, and in eleven countries there were significant differences in the prevalence of stunting: the pooled crude stunting prevalence ratio between indigenous and the reference group was 1.97 (95% CI 1.89; 2.05); after adjustment for wealth and place of residence, prevalence remained higher among indigenous (PR = 1.34, 95% CI 1.28; 1.39) in eight countries. Indigenous aged 6–23 months were more likely to be breastfed, but with poor complementary feeding, particularly in terms of dietary diversity. Afrodescendants showed few differences in height, and in two countries tended to be taller compared to the reference group.ConclusionsIn all Latin American countries studied, indigenous tended to be shorter and afrodescendants presented few differences with relation to the reference group. In order to reach the SDG’s challenge of leaving no one behind, indigenous need to be prioritized.

Highlights

  • Linear growth is widely regarded as an excellent marker of child health and well-being [1]

  • In low and middleincome countries (LMICs), linear growth faltering is pronounced during the window of the first

  • The socioeconomic determination of child stunting is made evident by the strong wealth-related inequalities that are present in most LMICs [3,4,5,6]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Linear growth is widely regarded as an excellent marker of child health and well-being [1]. In low and middleincome countries (LMICs), linear growth faltering is pronounced during the window of the first. The main immediate causes of growth faltering, and of child stunting include poor diets, inadequate care, and infectious diseases. Poverty is the major distal determinant of stunting, acting through the abovementioned immediate causes [1]. The socioeconomic determination of child stunting is made evident by the strong wealth-related inequalities that are present in most LMICs [3,4,5,6]. The prevalence of child stunting is falling in Latin America, socioeconomic inequalities persist. We aimed to describe ethnic inequalities of stunting and feeding practices in thirteen Latin American countries using recent nationally representative surveys

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.