Abstract

The ratio of right- to left-sided colonic cancer is increasing, but data on the distribution of its usual precursor lesion, the colorectal adenoma, are contradictory. Therefore, we investigated the prevalence of right- and left-sided colorectal adenomatous polyps from January 1, 1970, to September 30, 1989, using the study design of "epidemiologic necropsy" and the autopsy files of The Johns Hopkins Hospital. Compared with the decade of the 1970's, the 1980's showed a slight decrease in the overall prevalence of right-sided adenomas (6.4 per 1,000, 95% confidence limits 4.7-8.8 vs. 5.1 per 1,000, 95% CL 3.6-6.5), but a marked decrease occurred in left-sided adenomas (11.8 per 1,000, 95% CL 9.3-14.3 vs. 6.7 per 1,000, 95% CL 4.8-8.6). As a result, the ratio of right-sided to left-sided adenomas increased from 0.55 in the 1970's to 0.77 in the 1980's. This increased ratio occurred in both sexes, although prevalences were lower in females, and in whites. Unexpectedly, blacks had a ratio of right-sided to left-sided adenomas greater than unity in both the 1970's and 1980's (1.19 vs. 1.79) due to a relatively high prevalence of right-sided adenomas (5.8 per 1,000, 95% CL 3.6-8.0 in 1970's; 5.8 per 1,000, 95% CL 3.3-8.3 in 1980's), but low prevalences of left-sided adenomas (4.9 per 1,000, 95% CL 3.0-6.8 in 1970's; 3.2 per 1,000, 95% CL 1.2-5.2 in 1980's). The overall adenoma prevalence in blacks was lower than in whites. We conclude that the right-sided predominance of colorectal adenomas in blacks suggests ethnic differences in the pathogenesis of colorectal adenomas. This observation may have important implications for secondary prevention of colorectal cancer.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.