Abstract

BackgroundAdequate reporting of ethics-related research methods promotes convergence on best ethics practices. In physical therapy, studies on ethics reporting are limited to few aspects, and none focuses on stroke research. Our objectives were to investigate the reporting of multiple ethics-related features and its variation over time, and the characteristics of the studies associated with ethics reporting in Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) of physical therapy interventions after stroke.MethodsA random sample of RCTs published in the years 2004, 2009 and 2014, was extracted from the PubMed database, regardless of the publishing journal. For each trial we investigated year of publication, trial registration, sample size, stroke subtype, phase of the disease, setting, interventions and dosing, outcome measures, outcome of the study, PEDro score and 5-year impact factor of the publishing journal. Reporting of ethics-related issues was analyzed. Differences between groups were examined. Multiple regression was used to evaluate the relationship between ethics-related issues reporting and some studies’ characteristics.ResultsEighty studies were reviewed. Groups differed in the proportion of registered trials (p = .009), 5-year impact factor (p = .011), assessment of cognitive capacity (p = .049), declaration about conflict of interest (p < .001), and number of ethics-related issues reported (p = .009). The proportion of issues reported ranged from 92.5% (consent obtaining) to 0% (eventual follow up care). Post-hoc comparisons showed significantly greater reporting of ethics issues in trials published in the year 2014 compared to 2004 (p = .014, 95%CI = 0.40/4.26). Year of publication and PEDro score were significant predictors of adequate reporting.ConclusionsAuthors, editors, and reviewers should be more rigorous and demanding about the reporting of ethic-related methods in randomized controlled trials of physical therapy interventions after stroke.

Highlights

  • Adequate reporting of ethics-related research methods promotes convergence on best ethics practices

  • Randomized controlled trial (RCT), systematic review and meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) are considered reliable research designs, able to evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention [1]

  • Based on a sample of RCTs of physical therapy interventions after stroke, our objectives were to investigate the reporting of multiple ethics-related features and its variation over time, as well as the characteristics of the studies associated with ethics reporting

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Adequate reporting of ethics-related research methods promotes convergence on best ethics practices. Studies on ethics reporting are limited to few aspects, and none focuses on stroke research. Our objectives were to investigate the reporting of multiple ethics-related features and its variation over time, and the characteristics of the studies associated with ethics reporting in Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) of physical therapy interventions after stroke. Randomized controlled trial (RCT), systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs are considered reliable research designs, able to evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention [1]. Research conducted with little methodological rigor does not lead to knowledge or benefit, and exposes participants to unnecessary burden or harm [9]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call