Abstract

Aim: This study aims to initiate discussion on the ethical issues surrounding the development and implementation of technologies for workplace health promotion. We believe this is a neglected topic and such a complex field of study that we cannot come up with solutions easily or quickly. Therefore, this study is the starting point of a discussion about the ethics of and the need for policies around technologies for workplace health promotion.Method: Based on a literature review, the present study outlines current knowledge of ethical issues in research, development, and implementation of technologies in the workplace. Specifically, the focus is on two ethical issues that play an important role in the worker–employer relation: privacy and autonomy.Application: Two cases indicative for a multidisciplinary project aimed at developing and evaluating sensor and intervention technologies that contribute to keeping ageing workers healthy and effectively employable are explored. A context-specific approach of ethics is used to investigate ethical issues during the development and implementation of sensor and intervention technologies. It is a holistic approach toward the diverse field of participants and stakeholders, and the diversity in perceptions of relevant values, depending on their respective professional languages.Discussion: The results show how protecting the privacy and autonomy of workers cannot be seen as stand-alone issues, but, rather, there is interplay between these values, the work context, and the responsibilities of workers and employers. Consequently, technologies in this research project are designed to improve worker conscientious autonomy, while concurrently creating balance between privacy and health, and assigning responsibilities to appropriate stakeholders.Conclusion: Focusing on a contextual conceptualisation of the ethical principles in the design and implementation of digital health technologies helps to avoid compartmentalization, out-of-context generalisation, and neglect of identifying responsibilities. Although it is a long reiterative process in which all stakeholders need to be included in order to assess all ethical issues sufficiently, this process is crucial to achieving the intended goal of a technology. Having laid out the landscape and problems of ethics around technologies for workplace health promotion, we believe policies and standards, and a very overdue discussion about these, are needed.

Highlights

  • A major challenge caused by the ageing workforce is to keep workers fit for work [1] to achieve a sustainable workforce

  • Based on a substantial literature review, we aimed to discuss the importance of context-specific ethics in design and implementation of digital health technologies

  • Focusing on a contextual conceptualisation of the core ethical principles in the design and implementation of digital health technologies helps to avoid compartmentalisation, out-of-context generalisation, and neglect of identifying responsibilities. It is a long reiterative process in which all stakeholders need to be included in order to assess all critical ethical issues sufficiently, this process is crucial to achieving the intended goal of a technology

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A major challenge caused by the ageing workforce is to keep workers fit for work [1] to achieve a sustainable workforce. Examples of digital health technologies that are applied in the workplace are accelerometers, measuring bending, standing, and walking activities [3] and wearable sensors for measuring fatigue [4]. Technologies such as these are aimed at automatically measuring and intervening worker behaviour by giving (automated) feedback through digital means such as smart phones or stand-alone digital applications. These digital health technologies are used in addition to existing workplace health practises. Studies that describe the employed techniques to overcome the socio-ethical issues in development are lacking [9], and publications in the field of responsible research and innovation still struggle with three critical problems: compartmentalization, generalisation, and vagueness about responsible use [10,11,12,13]

Objectives
Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call