Ethics Consult: Using Hospice as "Treatment" for Behavioral Problems of Dementia

Abstract

Patients with Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia (BPSD) are among the most challenging patients to treat; these behaviors are estimated to occur in up to 90% of patients with dementia (Aigbogun 2019); of these, one in 5 patients displays aggression (Eastley 1997). The usual treatments have only modest efficacy at best and at times are ineffective in some individuals. Some behaviors such as physical aggression make it difficult, if not impossible, to find placement for these patients. Placement in nursing homes on a hospice status have traditionally required evidence of a 6 month life expectancy; placement in an inpatient hospice setting is usually reserved for patients with even shorter life expectancies such as 2 weeks. Prognosticating life expectancy in patients with dementia is challenging and often inaccurate (Jayes 2004). Furthermore the use of terminal palliative sedation is supposed to be confined to the last 2 weeks of life and/or extreme physical suffering (Schuman-Oliver 2008, AMA Opinion 2013).This session will present 2 cases of individuals with advanced dementia who did not meet the traditional Medicare criteria for hospice, as both were ambulatory and did not have significant co-morbid medical issues. Both had significant aggressive behaviors that responded poorly to extensive trials of various medications during extended stays on a geriatric psychiatry inpatient unit. Both were referred to a local inpatient hospice where the staff use “suffering" as a hospice criteria and were “treated” with the usual hospice medications and expired in less than 3 weeks.This session will use the two clinical cases to address the following: review the issue of prognostication of advanced dementia and the challenges of defining the end of life; review efforts to define “suffering” in advanced dementia in both the medical and ethics literature; review issues concerning palliative sedation; define how this differs from medical aid in dying and euthanasia. The experience of Dutch geriatricians addressing these issues will be presented (Veldwijck-Rouenhorst 2021). A geriatric psychiatrist will present the 2 cases and set up the questions and ethical issues that these cases pose. An ethics professor-scholar from Emory University will review the ethics literature and teachings that address these issues and help lead a discussion with the audience. The overall goal is to provide a framework of steps the audience members can take if confronted with similar cases.