Abstract
In this article, I discuss traditional philosophical descriptions of how to approach the ethical dilemmas presented by infants born at the margins of viability (currently, 23–24 weeks’ gestation). I then juxtapose these philosophical approaches to what might be called evidence-based ethics, in which the evidence in question is the predictive power of physicians to counsel parents regarding the likely outcome of these infants either before or after delivery. I suggest that the predictive power of data available before delivery are insufficient to allow a rational best-interests decision to be made, and that data available after birth promote a more nuanced approach to ethical decision-making for this difficult problem.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
