Abstract
Cheryl Noble discusses the emergence of applied ethics as a subdiscipline and expresses skepticism about the role of the philosopher as a technical "expert" on social problems. Peter Singer applauds the renewed interest of philosophers in social issues and points out the special advantages they may contribute to discussions of such issues. Jerry Avorn, a physician, sees a useful role for ethicists as teachers and resources for medical practitioners trained as generalists responsible for a patient's care. Daniel Wikler accepts Noble's contention that ethicists are in danger of becoming defenders of conventional morality but argues that applied analytic philosophy has contributed logical precision and vigor of argument on a number of pressing social issues. Tom Beauchamp also acknowledges validity in some of Noble's criticisms while analyzing a variety of weaknesses in her arguments.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
