Abstract
BackgroundIn Mexico, diabetes mellitus is the main cause of end − stage kidney disease, and some patients may be transplant candidates. Organ supply is limited because of cultural issues. And, there is a lack of standardized clinical guidelines regarding organ donation. These issues highlight the tension surrounding the fact that living donors are being selected despite being prediabetic. This article presents, examines and discusses using the principles of non-maleficience, autonomy, justice and the constitutionally guaranteed right to health, the ethical considerations that arise from considering a prediabetic person as a potential kidney donor.DiscussionDiabetes is an absolute contraindication for donating a kidney. However, the transplant protocols most frequently used in Mexico do not consider prediabetes as exclusion criteria. In prediabetic persons there are well known metabolic alterations that may compromise the long − term outcomes of the transplant if such donors are accepted. Even so, many of them are finally included because there are not enough donor candidates. Both, families and hospitals face the need to rapidly accept prediabetic donors before the clinical conditions of the recipient and the evolution of the disease exclude him/her as a transplant candidate; however, when using a kidney potentially damaged by prediabetes, neither the donor’s nor the recipient’s long term health is usually considered.Considering the ethical implication as well as the clinical and epidemiological evidence, we conclude that prediabetic persons are not suitable candidates for kidney donation. This recommendation should be taken into consideration by Mexican health institutions who should rewrite their transplant protocols.SummaryWe argue that the decision to use a kidney from a living donor known to be pre-diabetic or from those persons with family history of T2DM, obesity, hypertension, or renal failure, should be considered unethical in Mexico if the donor bases the decision to donate on socially acceptable norms rather than informed consent as understood in modern medicine.
Highlights
In Mexico, diabetes mellitus is the main cause of end − stage kidney disease, and some patients may be transplant candidates
Summary: We argue that the decision to use a kidney from a living donor known to be pre-diabetic or from those persons with family history of Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), obesity, hypertension, or renal failure, should be considered unethical in Mexico if the donor bases the decision to donate on socially acceptable norms rather than informed consent as understood in modern medicine
The Amsterdam forum establishes that T2DM patients should not be renal donors because they have a high risk of developing diabetic nephropathy; but it does not make a statement about considering people with prediabetes [10]
Summary
In Mexico, diabetes mellitus is the main cause of end − stage kidney disease, and some patients may be transplant candidates. Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) affects 6.4 million people [2], causing 40% of the cases of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). This condition requires treatment with dialysis (peritoneal or hemodialysis) or renal transplantation. According to the American Diabetes Association it is only necessary to lose 7% of weight and do 150 minutes of physical activity per week to control blood glucose levels [8,9] This goal is seemingly “easy” to achieve, yet it may cause some physicians underestimate the potential risks of prediabetes. The Amsterdam forum establishes that T2DM patients should not be renal donors because they have a high risk of developing diabetic nephropathy; but it does not make a statement about considering people with prediabetes [10]
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
