Ethical Generative AI: What Kind of AI Results are Desired by Society?

Abstract

There are many publications talking about the biases to be found in in generative AI solutions like large language models (LLMs, e.g., Mistral) or text-to-image models (T2IMs, e.g., Stable Diffusion). However, there is merely any publication to be found that questions what kind of behavior is actually desired, not only by a couple of researchers, but by society in general. Most researchers in this area seem to think that there would be a common agreement, but political debate in other areas shows that this is seldom the case, even for a single country. Climate change, for example, is an empirically well-proven scientific fact, 197 countries (including Germany) have declared to do their best to limit global warming to a maximum of 1.5°C in the Paris Agreement, but still renowned German scientists are calling LLMs biased if they state that there is human-made climate change and humanity is doing not enough to stop it. This trend is especially visible in Western individualistic societies that favor personal well-being over common good. In this article, we are exploring different aspects of biases found in LLMs and T2IMs, highlight potential divergence in the perception of ethically desirable outputs and discuss potential solutions with their advantages and drawbacks from the perspective of society. The analysis is carried out in an interdisciplinary manner with the authors coming from as diverse backgrounds as business information systems, political sciences, and law. Our contribution brings new insights to this debate and sheds light on an important aspect of the discussion that is largely ignored up to now.