Abstract

This article describes the legal and ethical problems encountered by the Birmingham Children's Homes Project while collecting oral history interviews from former residents and staff of children's homes. The article briefly discusses the background to the project and the wider debate about re-use of data. It then explains the measures considered and undertaken to edit transcripts of the interviews in order to avoid identifying former looked-after children and to remove remarks made by interviewees which could amount to defamation, while retaining enough content and context to make them valuable resources for both general researchers and former residents of children's homes.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.