Ethical Considerations in the Application of the Scientist–Practitioner Model for Psychologists Conducting Intervention Research

Abstract

This paper explores the scientist–practitioner model as a paradigm for psychologists involved in treatment research, as it has been instrumental in defining the field of clinical psychology as a science-driven profession. The principles and standards of the APA Ethics Code (Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct with the 2010 Amendments. Retrieved June 3, from, http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/index.aspx 2010) are used as the foundation to guide scientist–practitioners as they navigate unique ethical dilemmas and issues that arise when engaging in the simultaneous pursuit of research and clinical endeavors. Specific ethical issues will be discussed, including conflicts of interest, the process of informed consent, relationship boundaries, and boundaries of competence. Recommendations are made for optimizing outcomes for clients and professionals using this model, including adherence to established informed consent procedures and treatment research protocols, as well as collaboration with those not invested in the outcome of research and clinical endeavors. Solutions are proposed as a means of maintaining the principles of beneficence and nonmaleficence, fidelity and responsibility, and integrity in the ethical practice of treatment outcome research.