Ethical Considerations for the Workup of the Microhematuria Patient. Letter.

Abstract

No AccessJournal of UrologyLetters to the Editor1 May 2022Ethical Considerations for the Workup of the Microhematuria Patient. Letter. Jacob M. Gaines, Eric J. Macdonald, and Simon J. Hall Jacob M. GainesJacob M. Gaines https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1949-0225 Smith Institute for Urology at Northwell Health of the Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, New Hyde Park, New York More articles by this author , Eric J. MacdonaldEric J. Macdonald Smith Institute for Urology at Northwell Health of the Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, New Hyde Park, New York More articles by this author , and Simon J. HallSimon J. Hall * E-mail Address: [email protected] Smith Institute for Urology at Northwell Health of the Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, New Hyde Park, New York More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000002468AboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail "Ethical Considerations for the Workup of the Microhematuria Patient. Letter.." The Journal of Urology, 207(5), pp. 1161–1162 REFERENCES 1. : Diagnostic and cost implications of the 2020 AUA microhematuria guidelines: modeling impact in a large public health care system. J Urol 2022; 207: 52. Link, Google Scholar 2. : Microhematuria: AUA/SUFU guideline. J Urol 2020; 204: 778. Link, Google Scholar 3. : Evaluation of the new American Urological Association guidelines risk classification for hematuria. J Urol 2021; 205: 1387. Link, Google Scholar 4. : Comparison of microscopic hematuria guidelines as applied in 1018 patients with microscopic hematuria. Urology 2021; 154: 28. Google Scholar 5. : Psychological distress associated with active surveillance in patients younger than 70 with a small renal mass. Urol Oncol 2020; 38: 603.e17. Google Scholar 6. : Mental health implications in bladder cancer patients: a review. Urol Oncol 2019; 37: 97. Google Scholar 7. : Delays in diagnosis and bladder cancer mortality. Cancer 2010; 116: 5235. Google Scholar 8. : Non-maleficence and the ethics of consent to cancer screening. J Med Ethics 2020; 47: 510. Google Scholar © 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 207Issue 5May 2022Page: 1161-1162 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Jacob M. Gaines Smith Institute for Urology at Northwell Health of the Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, New Hyde Park, New York More articles by this author Eric J. Macdonald Smith Institute for Urology at Northwell Health of the Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, New Hyde Park, New York More articles by this author Simon J. Hall Smith Institute for Urology at Northwell Health of the Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, New Hyde Park, New York * E-mail Address: [email protected] More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF DownloadLoading ...