Abstract

Using three cases of watershed management in the Midwest as illustrations, this article argues that existing ethical guidelines for researching collaborative natural resource management are not always sufficient. While most researchers are monitored by institutional review boards, there are still numerous decisions that the researcher can make in the course of conducting research that can cause unintentional harm to the researched individuals and communities. The article focuses primarily on ethical considerations related to (1) collecting data and (2) publishing and dissemination of findings. The article concludes with suggested guidelines for conducting research on collaborative natural resource management efforts.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.