Abstract

The Department of Health and Human Services Framework for Guiding Funding Decisions about Proposed Research Involving Enhanced Potential Pandemic Pathogens (PPPs) contains a series of principles for governing the funding and conduct of gain-of-function (GOF) research resulting in the creation of PPPs. In this article, I address one of these principles, governing the replacement of GOF research with alternate experiments. I argue that the principle fails to address the way that different experiments can promote the same values as those promoted by GOF research resulting in PPPs. I then address some objections to this claim, and provide policy recommendations moving forward.

Highlights

  • Specialty section: This article was submitted to ELSI in Science and Genetics, a section of the journal Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology

  • Decisions about Proposed Research Involving Enhanced Potential Pandemic Pathogens (PPPs) contains a series of principles for governing the funding and conduct of gain-offunction (GOF) research resulting in the creation of PPPs

  • I argue that the principle fails to address the way that different experiments can promote the same values as those promoted by GOF research resulting in PPPs

Read more

Summary

Nicholas Greig Evans*

Specialty section: This article was submitted to ELSI in Science and Genetics, a section of the journal Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology

The Department of Health and Human Services Framework for Guiding Funding
THE POLICY PRINCIPLES
Findings
POTENTIAL OBJECTIONS
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call